Theresa Randle Faces Assault Allegations From Her Former Partner

Theresa Randle faces assault allegations from her former partner, bringing renewed attention to the actress known for her roles in Bad Boys and Malcolm X. In June 2026, her former boyfriend, Dario Pallini, filed court documents alleging that she entered his home without permission, assaulted him, and threatened him during two separate incidents. A judge granted a temporary restraining order following the filing. However, these claims remain allegations and should not be treated as proven facts. The case has raised questions about the reported incidents, Randle’s legal situation, and the court proceedings surrounding the dispute.

Who Is Theresa Randle? A brief biography

Who Is Theresa Randle?

Theresa Randle is an American actress recognized for her work in film and television. She became widely known for playing Theresa Burnett, the wife of Martin Lawrence’s character, in the Bad Boys film franchise. Her other credits include Malcolm X, Girl 6, Space Jam, and Spawn. Through these roles, she established herself as a familiar face in Hollywood during the 1990s and early 2000s. Her performances covered several genres, including comedy, drama, and action. Although she has maintained a relatively private public profile, her acting career continues to attract interest from film fans.

In recent years, public attention surrounding Theresa Randle has increasingly focused on reports about her legal difficulties rather than new acting projects. Her absence from Bad Boys: Ride or Die, released in 2024, also prompted discussion among fans, with Tasha Smith taking over the role of Theresa Burnett. The newer allegations involving her former partner have brought her name back into entertainment news. Nevertheless, it is important to separate her professional history from the legal claims now being reported. Allegations about personal conduct should be assessed through reliable evidence and legal proceedings, not assumptions based on a person’s public image. Read More : Noah Presgrove

What Are the Assault Allegations Against Theresa Randle?

According to reports published in June 2026, Dario Pallini filed a petition for a restraining order in Los Angeles County Superior Court on June 2. He alleged that he and Randle had been in a relationship for approximately two years before separating in 2024. In his filing, Pallini claimed that she continued contacting or approaching him after their breakup. He described two alleged incidents at his home in May and June 2026. These statements came from his court petition and have not, by themselves, established that the alleged conduct occurred as described.

Pallini’s petition reportedly alleged that Randle entered his residence without permission and physically attacked him during the incidents. He also claimed that she made threats and threw objects during an argument. The allegations described a dispute that allegedly continued after the relationship ended. Because these details come from one party’s account, they should be attributed to Pallini rather than stated as established facts. A court must consider the relevant evidence and applicable legal standards when deciding whether further protective measures are justified. As of the reporting reviewed for this article, no verified public finding had established the allegations as proven.

What Happened During the Reported May 18 Incident?

In his court filing, Pallini alleged that an incident occurred on May 18, 2026, at his apartment. He claimed that he woke up and found Randle inside the residence. According to his account, an argument followed, during which he alleged that she threatened him and struck him with a metal pole associated with his medical bed. These details were reported from his petition, rather than established through a criminal conviction or a final court finding. The available reporting did not independently confirm every part of his account or establish a complete sequence of events.

Pallini also reportedly alleged that he contacted police during the broader dispute. However, published reports indicated that authorities could not confirm a police response to the May 18 incident. This distinction matters because a claim appearing in a legal filing is not the same as an independently verified event. Investigators and courts may consider witness statements, records, and other evidence when evaluating such allegations. Until reliable evidence or a court decision clarifies the circumstances, readers should avoid presenting the account as proven. The May incident remains part of the allegations described in the restraining-order petition.

What Happened During the June 1 Incident?

Pallini’s petition described another alleged confrontation on June 1, 2026. He claimed that he returned home and found Randle inside his apartment, including in a closet with his dog. He further alleged that an argument developed after he asked her to leave. According to his account, she threw a can of vegetables that struck him on the head. These claims formed part of the request for legal protection filed the following day. They remain allegations attributed to Pallini, and the filing alone does not determine whether each reported detail is accurate.

The Los Angeles Police Department confirmed that officers responded to a domestic violence call at Pallini’s apartment on June 1, according to published reporting. That confirmation establishes that police attended a call, but it does not independently prove every allegation in the petition. Reports also indicated that Randle was made to leave the residence. The distinction between a police response and a legal finding is important when covering a case involving a public figure. Additional evidence, witness accounts, or court decisions may clarify what happened. Until then, responsible reporting should describe the claims carefully and avoid drawing conclusions about guilt.

Theresa Randle and the Temporary Restraining Order

On June 2, 2026, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge granted Pallini a temporary restraining order, according to media reports. The order followed his petition describing the alleged incidents and his concerns about further contact. A temporary restraining order is a legal measure intended to provide short-term protection while a court considers whether additional restrictions are appropriate. It does not automatically establish that every allegation in the petition is true. Courts may issue temporary orders before a full hearing so that the parties can present further information and the judge can assess the request.

Reports at the time said a hearing was scheduled for June 23, 2026, to consider whether longer-term protection should be granted. The publicly available reports reviewed for this article did not establish the final outcome of that hearing. Therefore, it would be inaccurate to claim that the temporary order remains active or that a permanent order was issued without confirmation. Court proceedings can change as judges review evidence and hear from both sides. Readers seeking an accurate understanding of the case should distinguish the initial order from any later ruling and avoid treating an interim legal decision as a final judgment.

Theresa Randle’s Previous Legal Issues

The allegations involving Pallini followed earlier legal incidents reported in connection with Randle. In October 2024, she was detained on suspicion of felony assault after police investigated an alleged incident in Los Angeles. The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office later declined to pursue that case, citing insufficient evidence. This outcome is an important part of the public record because an arrest or detention does not mean a person has been convicted. The decision not to proceed also means the reported 2024 incident should not be described as an established criminal offense committed by Randle.

In March 2026, Randle was reportedly booked on a felony charge related to corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant. Media reports said she was released two days later, with insufficient evidence cited in connection with her release. This incident was separate from the restraining-order petition filed by Pallini in June. The legal status and outcomes of individual cases must be considered separately, rather than combined into a single conclusion about a person’s conduct. A fair account should rely on confirmed court records and official statements. It should also avoid implying that earlier allegations prove the claims made in a later dispute.

Latest Updates on the Theresa Randle Case

The most clearly documented developments in the reports reviewed for this article occurred in June 2026. Pallini filed his petition on June 2, and the judge granted a temporary restraining order that day. News coverage identified June 23 as the scheduled hearing date for considering further protection. However, the available reporting did not provide a verified final ruling from that hearing. Without a confirmed update, it is not possible to state whether the order was extended, changed, or allowed to expire. This distinction is especially important because temporary court orders have specific legal limits and can change over time.

The case has also renewed public interest in Randle’s career and personal circumstances. However, news coverage should prioritize verified legal developments over speculation about her private life. A restraining-order petition, a police response, an arrest, and a criminal conviction are different things with different legal meanings. Readers should look for court-confirmed information before drawing conclusions about the dispute. Future filings or official statements may provide greater clarity about the allegations and their legal status. Until reliable updates become available, the most accurate summary is that Pallini made serious allegations, a temporary order was granted in June, and the later outcome requires confirmation.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. Who accused Theresa Randle of assault?

Her former boyfriend, Dario Pallini, made the allegations in a court petition filed in June 2026.

2. What is Theresa Randle accused of?

Pallini alleged unauthorized entry, physical assaults, threats, and throwing objects during two reported incidents.

3. Was a restraining order issued against Theresa Randle?

Yes, a judge granted a temporary restraining order on June 2, 2026.

4. Has Theresa Randle been convicted of these allegations?

The reports reviewed do not establish a conviction related to Pallini’s allegations.

5. What is the latest confirmed case update?

Reports identified a June 23, 2026, hearing, but the later outcome could not be verified from available reporting.

Conclusion

Theresa Randle faces serious allegations from her former partner, Dario Pallini, concerning two reported incidents in May and June 2026. A judge granted a temporary restraining order after Pallini filed his petition, bringing renewed attention to the actress’s personal and legal circumstances. However, allegations in court documents should not be confused with proven misconduct, and the final outcome of the scheduled hearing remains unconfirmed in the reporting reviewed here. Randle’s earlier legal incidents also had separate outcomes and should not be treated as proof of the new claims. Readers should follow verified court developments for a clearer understanding of the case.